Prop Firms Offering Metals Leverage of 1:15 or Higher
Prop firms offering metals leverage of 1:15 or higher allow traders to access leveraged positions in precious metals markets. Leverage limits vary by firm and are defined by internal risk rules. This page highlights firms that meet the selected leverage threshold. Compare available options to find firms aligned with your metals trading strategy.
United Kingdom
MT5
Switzerland
MT5
Match-Trader
Bybit
United Kingdom
MT5
Malta
Match-Trader
Saint Lucia
MT5
cTrader
Match-Trader
Volumetrica
Malaysia
MT4
MT5
DXtrade
United Kingdom
MT5
cTrader
DXtrade
Czech Republic
MT4
MT5
cTrader
DXtrade
Malta
MT5
cTrader
United Arab Emirates
MT5
cTrader
Match-Trader
United Kingdom
cTrader
Ireland
MT4
MT5
Quadcode
Seychelles
MT4
MT5
United Arab Emirates
MT4
MT5
cTrader
Hong Kong
MT4
MT5
cTrader
Match-Trader
DXtrade
United Kingdom
MT4
MT5
cTrader
DXtrade
Singapore
cTrader
United States
MT5
cTrader
Match-Trader
United Arab Emirates
MT4
MT5
cTrader
Match-Trader What 1:15 metals leverage means inside a prop-firm challenge
The firms in the comparison above all offer leverage of at least 1:15 on metals — most commonly spot gold (XAU/USD) and spot silver (XAG/USD). In a proprietary trading context, “leverage” is not a margin loan from a broker. You are trading a simulated evaluation or funded account, and the leverage figure tells you how much notional metals exposure the firm’s risk engine will let you open against the account balance it has assigned you. A 1:15 cap means that for every dollar of account size, you can control up to fifteen dollars of gold or silver position before the platform rejects further size.
Metals are treated as their own leverage bucket on purpose. Gold and silver are far more volatile per tick than major FX pairs, so prop firms routinely set a lower leverage ceiling on metals than they advertise for currencies. It is common to see a firm headline “up to 1:100” — and then quietly apply 1:15 or 1:20 to XAU/USD in the rule book. That is why filtering specifically on metals leverage matters: the firm’s flagship number rarely applies to the instrument you actually want to trade here.
Why 1:15 is a meaningful threshold for metals
1:15 sits at the practical floor of what an active metals trader needs, which is exactly why it is a useful cut-off. It is enough buying power to take a position of real size relative to the account, while still being conservative enough that a single adverse swing in gold does not instantly breach a tight daily drawdown rule. To put the threshold in perspective:
- Below 1:15 (for example 1:5 or 1:10 on metals) you need substantially more of the account’s notional headroom to express the same view, and scalping or news-driven gold strategies become capital-inefficient. Firms that low on metals are usually prioritising risk control over trader flexibility.
- At 1:15 you have workable room for swing and intraday metals trades on a typical evaluation account, without the leverage itself being the thing that blows the account.
- Materially higher (1:30, 1:50 or more on metals) gives more exposure per dollar, which suits short-hold scalpers — but it cuts both ways. The same leverage that lets a small move pay also lets a small move against you eat through a percentage-based daily loss limit before you can react.
So 1:15-or-higher is best read as “enough leverage to trade metals seriously, with the headroom scaling up from there”. It filters out the firms whose metals caps are too restrictive for anything but the lightest positions.
Who 1:15+ metals leverage suits
- Traders whose edge is specifically in gold or silver rather than FX, who were burned by a firm advertising high FX leverage but throttling metals.
- Swing and intraday metals traders who want meaningful position size without needing the most aggressive leverage on offer.
- Newer funded traders who want a sensible middle ground — enough leverage to work with, not so much that drawdown rules become unforgiving.
It is less suited to high-frequency gold scalpers chasing maximum exposure, who will want to look further up the leverage range, and to very conservative traders who would rather a lower cap protect them from over-sizing.
How leverage interacts with the rules that actually matter
Leverage on its own decides nothing about whether you pass a challenge — the drawdown rules do. A high metals leverage number is only useful if the firm’s maximum daily loss and overall drawdown limits give you room to use it. The combination to watch for when comparing the firms above:
- Leverage versus daily loss limit: generous metals leverage paired with a very tight daily loss percentage means one oversized gold trade can end your evaluation in a single candle. Read both numbers together, not in isolation.
- How drawdown is measured: trailing/high-water-mark drawdown punishes leveraged metals swings harder than a static end-of-day balance check, because an intraday spike in your equity raises the floor you must not fall below.
- Stop-out and margin-call behaviour: confirm whether the platform auto-closes metals positions at a margin threshold or simply blocks new orders, since that changes how a fast gold move plays out.
- Weekend and news holding rules: many firms restrict holding leveraged metals over rollover or around high-impact data — relevant because gold reacts sharply to rate decisions and inflation prints.
What to verify before you trust a “1:15 metals” claim
Prop firms are, in most jurisdictions, not licensed or supervised financial brokers. You are buying an evaluation service under a private contract, not opening a regulated brokerage account, so there is generally no local regulator, no investor-compensation scheme, and no client-money segregation behind the leverage figure. That makes the firm’s own rule book and track record your main safeguards. Practical checks:
- Find the leverage on the metals/commodities line specifically in the written rules — not the homepage headline — and confirm it applies to both the evaluation and the funded stage, since some firms cut leverage after you pass.
- Check whether the quoted leverage is fixed or dynamic, shrinking as position size or account balance grows; dynamic models can leave you with far less than 1:15 on a large gold trade.
- Confirm metals are tradable at all on the platform tier you are buying, and whether there are session restrictions on XAU/XAG.
- Look at the firm’s payout track record and rule transparency rather than any implied “regulation” — in this space, consistent, documented payouts and a stable rule book matter more than a leverage number.
Frequently asked questions
Does 1:15 metals leverage mean I can also get it on FX?
Not necessarily — and often the reverse. Many firms set a higher leverage ceiling on FX majors and a deliberately lower one on metals because gold and silver are more volatile per tick. The 1:15 figure used to build this list applies to metals specifically, so a firm here may offer considerably more or less on currency pairs. Always read the per-asset-class line in the rule book.
Is higher metals leverage always better?
No. More leverage increases exposure per dollar in both directions, and prop-firm evaluations are won or lost on drawdown limits, not on how big a position you can theoretically open. Leverage above 1:15 helps scalpers who need maximum size, but it makes it easier to breach a tight daily loss rule on a single gold swing. The right level depends on your strategy and the firm’s drawdown structure.
Does the leverage apply to the funded account or just the challenge?
It should apply to both, but confirm it. Some firms quote attractive leverage on the paid evaluation and then reduce it once you are trading the funded stage. Because the funded account is where you actually earn a profit split, the leverage that matters most is the one in force after you pass — check the funded-stage rules, not just the challenge marketing.
Is a prop firm offering 1:15 on metals a regulated broker?
Generally no. Most retail prop firms run simulated evaluations under a private contract and are not authorised or supervised as brokers in their or your jurisdiction, so the leverage is a platform setting rather than a regulated margin product. There is usually no compensation scheme or client-money protection behind it. Judge these firms on rule transparency, the demo-versus-live model, and a verifiable payout history instead.
Audacity Capital vs Crypto Fund Trader - Comparison of Top Firms in This Guide
Audacity Capital vs Crypto Fund Trader - Prop Firm Comparison (June 2026)
Head-to-head comparison of Audacity Capital and Crypto Fund Trader. Check max funding, profit splits, daily and overall drawdown rules, leverage, tradable assets, payout frequency, payment and payout methods, trading permissions and KYC restrictions before you buy a challenge. Data refreshed June 2026.
Bottom Line: Audacity Capital vs Crypto Fund Trader
Audacity Capital and Crypto Fund Trader are closely matched — each leads in several categories, so the right pick depends on your priorities.
Where Audacity Capital leads
- Max Funding ($2,000,000 vs $300,000)
- Max Total Loss (15% vs 2%)
- Payout Processing Time (14 vs 48)
- Payment Methods (4 vs 3)
Where Crypto Fund Trader leads
- Days to First Payout (15 vs 30)
- Profit Split Start (80% vs 50%)
- Platforms (3 vs 1)
- Assets (5 vs 2)
- Payout Methods (6 vs 3)
Choose Audacity Capital for Max Funding. Choose Crypto Fund Trader for Days to First Payout.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Audacity Capital or Crypto Fund Trader better?
Which has a better Max Funding, Audacity Capital or Crypto Fund Trader?
Which has a better Days to First Payout, Audacity Capital or Crypto Fund Trader?
|
Audacity Capital
Audacity Capital is a proprietary trading firm founded in 2012 in London that offers multiple funding paths including the Ability Challenge evaluation and a Funded Trader Program, advertising accounts up to $2,000,000, profit share up to 90%, and trading via...
|
Crypto Fund Trader
Crypto Fund Trader (CFT) is a Switzerland-based crypto-first evaluation firm operated via SWISS RLCRATES AG that offers 1-phase, 2-phase, Instant and Ascend models with no time limits on standard challenges, trading via MT5, Match Trader and Bybit, simulated allocations up...
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Trustpilot Rating | 0 | 0 |
| Trustpilot Reviews | 0 | 0 |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | Switzerland |
| Age (Years) | 14 | 5 |
| Max Funding | $2,000,000 | $300,000 |
| Profit Split Start | 50% | 80% |
| Profit Split Max | 90% | 90% |
| Platforms | MT5 | MT5 Match-Trader Bybit |
| Assets | Forex Commodities | Crypto Forex Indices Commodities Stocks |
| Leverage | ||
| FX Leverage | 100 | 100 |
| Metals Leverage | 100 | 100 |
| Crypto Leverage | 2 | 100 |
| Risk & Drawdown Rules | ||
| Max Daily Loss | Maximum Daily LossAbility Challenge uses a static daily drawdown that resets at rollover (00:00 GMT+2): 7.5% during the Challenge stage and 5% during the Verification stage. Audacity also states the Ability Live phase daily drawdown is 5%. The Funded Trader Program (FTP) uses a 5% trailing daily drawdown (moves up with equity highs). | Maximum Daily LossCrypto Fund Trader calculates daily drawdown based on equity. For standard evaluations, the daily maximum loss is measured from the starting balance at 12:05 AM UTC. CFT lists the default daily limits as 5% on 2-phase evaluations and 4% on 1-phase evaluations.Add-ons may modify certain limits (for example, a 2-phase add-on that increases daily drawdown to 6%). Ascend also adds a specific news window risk constraint (see “News Trading”). |
| Max Total Loss | Maximum Overall LossAbility Challenge maximum drawdown is 15% in the Challenge stage and 10% in the Verification stage (and the firm also references a 10% maximum drawdown in the Ability Live phase). FTP maximum total drawdown is 10% from the initial balance. Ability One lists a 6% absolute drawdown. | Maximum Overall LossCFT’s standard evaluation structures use different overall loss models:2-Phase: maximum loss is typically fixed at 10% of initial balance.1-Phase: a 6% trailing drawdown applies (equity-based), and once the account exceeds +6% profit, the trailing line locks at the initial balance instead of continuing to trail upward.3-Phase (if selected): CFT states a 5% fixed maximum loss with a 5% daily max loss.Add-ons may increase max loss limits (e.g., a 2-phase add-on raising max loss to 12%). |
| Drawdown Type | Drawdown ModelAudacity's Ability Challenge and Verification stages are described as using a static drawdown system with daily limits resetting at rollover (00:00 GMT+2). FTP uses a trailing drawdown model (daily DD 5% trailing). Ability One uses static drawdown (3% daily and 6% absolute). | Drawdown ModelCrypto Fund Trader’s drawdown enforcement is primarily equity-based. The daily loss limit resets using the account’s starting balance at 12:05 AM UTC. For overall drawdown, CFT uses static/fixed overall loss on 2-phase challenges (e.g., 10% of initial) and a trailing model on 1-phase challenges (6% trailing that later locks at the initial balance after +6% gain).Accounts that breach max daily, max overall, or trailing drawdown are deactivated and the trader is notified by email. |
| Payouts | ||
| Payout Frequency | Payout FrequencyAbility Challenge: first payout can be requested 30 days after the first trade on the Ability Live account, then payouts may be requested bi-weekly. FTP: payouts can be requested once a 10% profit milestone is reached (profit share varies by account size and time-to-target). | Payout FrequencyIn the final-stage simulation, scholarship requests can be made after at least 15 trading days, or alternatively every 30 calendar days (if rules were not violated). Certain program variants (e.g., 3-phase rules) note a first request possible after 5 trading days, and an add-on may allow eligibility after 7 active trading days.For Instant accounts, CFT also supports a scale milestone: once the account reaches +10% profit, traders can request a “Withdrawal & Update” to both withdraw and double the account size. |
| Days to First Payout | 30 | 15 |
| Payout Processing Time | 14 | Payout ProcessingCFT states that once a scholarship is requested, its team verifies the information and sends payment within 48 business hours. After the payment is sent, CFT states the user receives the scholarship in no more than 24 hours (timing depends on the payment rail). |
| Payout Methods | Bank Transfer PayPal Cryptocurrency | Bank Transfer (EUR USD) Crypto (USDT ERC20 USDT TRC20 BTC ETH) |
| Payments | ||
| Payment Methods | Credit/Debit Card PayPal Cryptocurrency | Credit/Debit Card Crypto (11 supported currencies) |
| Trading Permissions | ||
| News Trading | Ability Challenge: news trading is permitted during news events in both challenge phases and on the Ability Live account. FTP: holding open positions is prohibited during significant news events; traders must wait 30 minutes after the release once notified by the risk team. | News trading is allowed on CFT evaluations according to its FAQ. For Ascend evaluations, CFT adds a news-window constraint: within 2 minutes before and after high-impact news or market opening, accounts must not open/add positions or raise maximum theoretical loss above 2% of initial balance. |
| Weekend Trades | Allowed: Ability Challenge (including Ability Live) allows weekend holding; Ability One also allows weekend holding, subject to drawdown limits. | Weekend/overnight holding is generally allowed (CFT states it accepts swing trading strategies and keeping trades open over the weekend). Market availability still follows instrument schedules: crypto trades 24/7 while forex is typically Monday–Friday and other CFDs follow their own market hours. |
| Copy Trading | Audacity Capital allows copy trading, subject to specific restrictions designed to ensure that all trades originate from the trader’s own strategy and accounts. Permitted Copy Trading Own Accounts: Copying trades between your own Audacity Capital accounts is permitted. External Personal Accounts: Copying trades from your personal trading accounts with other brokers or prop firms into your Audacity Capital account is allowed. Verification of the source account may be required. EAs / Automated Systems: Expert Advisors and other automated trading tools... | CFT does not present a simple “copy trading allowed” rule in its public FAQ. However, it explicitly restricts multi-account coordination through rules such as the reverse trading/hedging constraints, and it states that copy trading between Ascend accounts is prohibited (including coordinated or mirrored behaviour that cannot be attributed to chance). |
| EA Allowed | EA Guidelines and Restrictions Permitted Use: Expert Advisors (EAs) are generally allowed on MetaTrader 5 (MT5) for both the Ability Challenge and the Funded Trader Program. Prohibited EA Strategies: The following automated trading styles are strictly forbidden and may result in account termination: High-Frequency Trading (HFT) and Tick Scalping: Not permitted. Martingale or Averaging Down Strategies: Not permitted. Latency Arbitrage: Any form of latency arbitrage or exploitation of system vulnerabilities is strictly prohibited. Grid Trading: Not permitted. Third-Party EAs: While... | Automation is partially supported: CFT lists categories of prohibited EA types (notably HFT, tick scalping, arbitrage and demo-environment exploitation). EAs that do not fall into these categories are not explicitly banned in the FAQ, but traders remain responsible for ensuring automation complies with all rules. |
| KYC & Restrictions | ||
| KYC Required | No | No |
| KYC Stage | KYC is required before account activation and again before processing payouts. Audacity states KYC includes proof of identity (government-issued photo ID) and a selfie, and may need to be resubmitted for compliance. | KYC is required as part of the scholarship/withdrawal workflow. After a scholarship request is submitted in the dashboard, CFT states the trader receives a contract to sign and a KYC to complete before funds are sent. (Bybit evaluations may additionally be subject to Bybit’s own KYC rules, which are the trader’s responsibility.) |
| Restricted Countries | Bangladesh Belarus Burma (Myanmar) Central African Republic Crimea Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine Cuba Democratic Republic of the Congo Iran Iraq Lebanon Libya North Korea Pakistan Russia Somalia Sudan Syria United States and its territories (including American Samoa Guam Northern Mariana Islands Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands) Venezuela Yemen | N/A |
Audacity Capital
Crypto Fund Trader
Build your own comparison
Select any 2-6 firms from this guide and open them in the full comparison table.
Tip: if you do not select any firms we will start with the top 2 from this guide.