Prop Firms Offering Crypto Leverage of 1:100 or Higher
This guide features prop firms that support crypto leverage starting from 1:100. Higher leverage availability can impact position sizing and capital efficiency in crypto trading. Filtering firms by leverage thresholds helps narrow suitable programs. All firms listed meet or exceed the selected crypto leverage level.
Switzerland
MT5
Match-Trader
Bybit
Czech Republic
Bybit Cleo What 1:100 crypto leverage means inside a prop-firm challenge
The firms in the comparison above all offer buying power of at least 1:100 on cryptocurrency instruments inside their evaluations and funded accounts. In a prop-firm context this number is not the same thing as the leverage a retail exchange or broker would extend to you on your own money. Here the account is the firm’s simulated capital, and the leverage figure describes how large a crypto position you are allowed to open relative to the simulated balance the evaluation assigns you. At 1:100, a $10,000 simulated account lets you control roughly $1,000,000 of notional crypto exposure, so a position of one Bitcoin contract ties up only a small slice of the balance as margin.
Because crypto is far more volatile than major FX pairs, most prop firms deliberately keep crypto leverage lower than the 1:50 to 1:100 (or higher) they hand out on forex. Seeing a firm publish 1:100 or higher on crypto specifically tells you it is comfortable letting traders take meaningful directional size on Bitcoin, Ether and sometimes a handful of altcoins — and that its risk engine and drawdown rules are built to police that, rather than simply banning the asset class.
Why the 1:100 threshold matters, and how it compares to higher and lower levels
The leverage level is only useful when you read it next to the firm’s drawdown limits, because the two interact directly. Higher crypto leverage does not make a challenge easier — it makes each tick of price move your equity faster, which can trip a daily or maximum drawdown breach in seconds during a volatile candle.
- Below 1:100 (for example 1:2, 1:5 or 1:10, which is common on crypto): you need more simulated capital committed per trade to reach the same position size, your margin usage is heavier, and scalping or news-trading crypto becomes capital-inefficient. This suits cautious swing traders who hold smaller size for longer.
- At 1:100: you can express a high-conviction crypto idea with a modest fraction of the balance as margin, leaving room to run several positions or to size up on a single setup. It is generous enough for active intraday crypto trading without being so high that a normal stop-loss becomes irrelevant to your margin.
- Materially above 1:100 (1:200, 1:500 and up, occasionally advertised): the headline number looks attractive but is largely cosmetic once your position size is capped by the drawdown rule. Past a certain point, extra leverage only matters if you intend to hold size that would breach the account anyway. Treat very high crypto leverage as a marketing figure, not a real edge.
In other words, 1:100 is roughly the level where leverage stops being the binding constraint and the firm’s drawdown rules, lot caps and position limits become what actually governs how much crypto you can trade. That is why this threshold is a sensible filter: it screens out firms that treat crypto as a token afterthought while not over-rewarding ones that simply inflate the number.
Who 1:100 crypto leverage suits
- Active intraday and momentum traders who want to take real size on Bitcoin and Ether during volatile sessions.
- Traders moving from a crypto exchange or CFD account who are used to three-figure leverage and do not want to feel capital-starved inside an evaluation.
- Anyone running multiple simultaneous crypto positions who needs margin headroom to do so without tripping a margin call on the simulated account.
Who it does not suit
- Conservative swing traders holding positions across weekends, who may be more concerned with whether crypto can be held over the weekend and what the overnight/weekend financing rules are than with the raw leverage number.
- Traders who assume high leverage equals an easy pass — the drawdown rule, not the leverage, is what fails most evaluations.
What to check beyond the headline leverage number
Two firms can both advertise 1:100 on crypto and still be very different to trade. When you compare the list above, look past the number itself and confirm the surrounding rules, because that is where the real differences live.
- Which crypto instruments qualify: some firms apply their highest leverage only to Bitcoin and Ether and drop sharply for altcoins, or restrict the tradable crypto universe to a short list.
- Weekend and overnight rules: crypto trades 24/7, but many prop firms force-close or forbid holding crypto over the weekend, or apply different leverage and financing after hours. A 1:100 figure is far less useful if you cannot hold the position when your thesis plays out.
- How drawdown is measured: trailing versus static maximum drawdown, and whether the daily loss limit is calculated on balance or on equity, decides how quickly a fast crypto move can end your account at any leverage.
- Whether the leverage is the same in the evaluation and the funded phase: some firms reduce buying power once you are funded, so the 1:100 you tested with is not what you trade on real payouts.
- News and event restrictions: some firms prohibit trading around major catalysts, which directly affects whether high crypto leverage is usable when volatility is actually present.
It is also worth remembering what the leverage figure does not tell you. It says nothing about the firm’s regulatory standing — and in most countries a prop firm is not a licensed broker at all. Traders here are buying an evaluation service, not opening a regulated brokerage account, so there is generally no local financial-regulator authorisation behind it, no investor-compensation scheme and no client-money segregation. The simulated nature of the account, the profit split you keep, the payout track record and the clarity of the rulebook matter far more to your real outcome than whether crypto leverage is 1:100 or 1:200.
Frequently asked questions
Does 1:100 crypto leverage make a prop-firm challenge easier to pass?
No. Higher leverage lets you open larger crypto positions with less margin, but it also moves your equity faster, so it can trip a daily or maximum drawdown breach more quickly during volatile candles. Most evaluations are failed on the drawdown rule, not the leverage, so 1:100 is best seen as flexibility, not an advantage on the pass rate.
Is 1:100 high or low for crypto at a prop firm?
For crypto specifically it is on the generous end. Because crypto is so volatile, many firms cap crypto leverage well below their forex leverage — single or low-double digits is common. A published 1:100 or higher on crypto signals the firm is comfortable letting traders take real directional size on the asset class, rather than treating it as an afterthought.
Why would I choose 1:100 over a firm advertising 1:500 on crypto?
Past a certain point extra leverage is cosmetic, because your real position size is already capped by the firm’s drawdown limit. A very high figure rarely lets you trade larger in practice. At 1:100 the leverage usually stops being the binding constraint, so it is sensible to weigh the drawdown rules, weekend-holding policy and payout terms more heavily than the headline number.
Can I actually hold crypto positions overnight or over the weekend at 1:100?
That depends entirely on the firm, not on the leverage. Crypto trades around the clock, but many prop firms still force-close or forbid holding crypto over the weekend, or change leverage and financing after hours. Always confirm the specific firm’s overnight and weekend rules from the comparison above before relying on the leverage figure.
Crypto Fund Trader vs Mubite - Comparison of Top Firms in This Guide
Crypto Fund Trader vs Mubite - Prop Firm Comparison (July 2026)
Head-to-head comparison of Crypto Fund Trader and Mubite. Check max funding, profit splits, daily and overall drawdown rules, leverage, tradable assets, payout frequency, payment and payout methods, trading permissions and KYC restrictions before you buy a challenge. Data refreshed July 2026.
Bottom Line: Crypto Fund Trader vs Mubite
Crypto Fund Trader comes out ahead overall, leading in 6 of 9 compared categories.
Where Crypto Fund Trader leads
- Max Funding ($300,000 vs $200,000)
- Profit Split Start (80% vs 70%)
- Max Daily Loss (12% vs 4%)
- Platforms (3 vs 2)
- Assets (5 vs 2)
- Payout Methods (6 vs 1)
Where Mubite leads
- Days to First Payout (14 vs 15)
- Max Total Loss (6% vs 2%)
- Payout Processing Time (24 vs 48)
Choose Crypto Fund Trader for Max Funding. Choose Mubite for Days to First Payout.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Crypto Fund Trader or Mubite better?
Which has a better Max Funding, Crypto Fund Trader or Mubite?
Which has a better Days to First Payout, Crypto Fund Trader or Mubite?
|
Crypto Fund Trader
Crypto Fund Trader (CFT) is a Switzerland-based crypto-first evaluation firm operated via SWISS RLCRATES AG that offers 1-phase, 2-phase, Instant and Ascend models with no time limits on standard challenges, trading via MT5, Match Trader and Bybit, simulated allocations up...
|
Mubite
Mubite (Mubite s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic) is a crypto-native prop firm that funds traders exclusively on cryptocurrency futures — 700+ USDT perpetual markets via Bybit and Cleo, leverage up to 1:100. It offers Two-Step, One-Step and Instant Funding routes across...
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Trustpilot Rating | 0 | 0 |
| Trustpilot Reviews | 0 | 0 |
| Headquarters | Switzerland | Czech Republic |
| Age (Years) | 5 | 1 |
| Max Funding | $300,000 | $200,000 |
| Profit Split Start | 80% | 70% |
| Profit Split Max | 90% | 90% |
| Platforms | MT5 Match-Trader Bybit | Bybit Cleo |
| Assets | Crypto Forex Indices Commodities Stocks | Crypto futures only — BTC ETH & altcoin USDT perpetuals (700+ markets) |
| Leverage | ||
| FX Leverage | 100 | 0 |
| Metals Leverage | 100 | 0 |
| Crypto Leverage | 100 | 100 |
| Risk & Drawdown Rules | ||
| Max Daily Loss | Maximum Daily LossCrypto Fund Trader calculates daily drawdown based on equity. For standard evaluations, the daily maximum loss is measured from the starting balance at 12:05 AM UTC. CFT lists the default daily limits as 5% on 2-phase evaluations and 4% on 1-phase evaluations.Add-ons may modify certain limits (for example, a 2-phase add-on that increases daily drawdown to 6%). Ascend also adds a specific news window risk constraint (see “News Trading”). | Daily Loss LimitMubite applies a daily loss limit on its evaluation programs:One-Step: ~4% of account size.Two-Step: ~5% of account size.Per-dollar amounts are not published per account size. Mubite’s Terms also reference a maximum 5% daily stop-loss on the initial balance and a maximum 3% risk per trade. Confirm the exact daily limit for your chosen account in writing. |
| Max Total Loss | Maximum Overall LossCFT’s standard evaluation structures use different overall loss models:2-Phase: maximum loss is typically fixed at 10% of initial balance.1-Phase: a 6% trailing drawdown applies (equity-based), and once the account exceeds +6% profit, the trailing line locks at the initial balance instead of continuing to trail upward.3-Phase (if selected): CFT states a 5% fixed maximum loss with a 5% daily max loss.Add-ons may increase max loss limits (e.g., a 2-phase add-on raising max loss to 12%). | Maximum / Overall DrawdownOne-Step: ~6% of account size.Two-Step: ~8% of account size.Instant Funding: ~10%, tightening to ~5% once the account reaches +5% profit.Drawdown is described as measured from the starting balance. The exact basis (balance vs equity, intraday vs end-of-day) is not clearly documented on Mubite’s site — verify before trading. |
| Drawdown Type | Drawdown ModelCrypto Fund Trader’s drawdown enforcement is primarily equity-based. The daily loss limit resets using the account’s starting balance at 12:05 AM UTC. For overall drawdown, CFT uses static/fixed overall loss on 2-phase challenges (e.g., 10% of initial) and a trailing model on 1-phase challenges (6% trailing that later locks at the initial balance after +6% gain).Accounts that breach max daily, max overall, or trailing drawdown are deactivated and the trader is notified by email. | Drawdown ModelMubite describes its drawdown as calculated from the starting account balance (static-style) rather than a trailing model. However, the firm does not clearly state whether the limit is evaluated intraday or end-of-day, or against balance vs equity. Because some reviewers report rules being enforced at the withdrawal stage, get the exact drawdown calculation confirmed in writing. |
| Payouts | ||
| Payout Frequency | Payout FrequencyIn the final-stage simulation, scholarship requests can be made after at least 15 trading days, or alternatively every 30 calendar days (if rules were not violated). Certain program variants (e.g., 3-phase rules) note a first request possible after 5 trading days, and an add-on may allow eligibility after 7 active trading days.For Instant accounts, CFT also supports a scale milestone: once the account reaches +10% profit, traders can request a “Withdrawal & Update” to both withdraw and double the account size. | Payout FrequencyOne-Step / Two-Step (funded): on-demand payouts once your account is approved.Instant Funding: first payout 14 days after your first trade, then bi-weekly.Reviewers note a per-request payout cap of around 5% of account size. KYC must be completed before any withdrawal. |
| Days to First Payout | 15 | 14 |
| Payout Processing Time | Payout ProcessingCFT states that once a scholarship is requested, its team verifies the information and sends payment within 48 business hours. After the payment is sent, CFT states the user receives the scholarship in no more than 24 hours (timing depends on the payment rail). | Payout ProcessingMubite advertises fast crypto payouts, typically processed within 24 hours (some funded traders report minutes to a few hours). Payouts are sent in cryptocurrency (USDT). Note: independent reviewers have flagged isolated reports of payout denials tied to after-the-fact rule reviews — keep clean records of your trades. |
| Payout Methods | Bank Transfer (EUR USD) Crypto (USDT ERC20 USDT TRC20 BTC ETH) | Cryptocurrency (USDT) |
| Payments | ||
| Payment Methods | Credit/Debit Card Crypto (11 supported currencies) | Credit/Debit Card Cryptocurrency |
| Trading Permissions | ||
| News Trading | News trading is allowed on CFT evaluations according to its FAQ. For Ascend evaluations, CFT adds a news-window constraint: within 2 minutes before and after high-impact news or market opening, accounts must not open/add positions or raise maximum theoretical loss above 2% of initial balance. | Restricted. Mubite’s FAQ lists news trading among prohibited activities, although its marketing pages imply flexible API trading. Because this is stated inconsistently across Mubite’s own pages — and rules are reportedly checked at withdrawal — treat news trading as not permitted unless support confirms otherwise in writing for your account. |
| Weekend Trades | Weekend/overnight holding is generally allowed (CFT states it accepts swing trading strategies and keeping trades open over the weekend). Market availability still follows instrument schedules: crypto trades 24/7 while forex is typically Monday–Friday and other CFDs follow their own market hours. | Allowed. Crypto markets trade 24/7, so Mubite permits holding positions overnight and through weekends. Be mindful of perpetual funding costs on held positions. |
| Copy Trading | CFT does not present a simple “copy trading allowed” rule in its public FAQ. However, it explicitly restricts multi-account coordination through rules such as the reverse trading/hedging constraints, and it states that copy trading between Ascend accounts is prohibited (including coordinated or mirrored behaviour that cannot be attributed to chance). | Not allowed. Mubite’s FAQ and Terms prohibit copy trading, mirroring, account rolling, group/coordinated trading, and third-party account management unless explicitly approved by the firm. |
| EA Allowed | Automation is partially supported: CFT lists categories of prohibited EA types (notably HFT, tick scalping, arbitrage and demo-environment exploitation). EAs that do not fall into these categories are not explicitly banned in the FAQ, but traders remain responsible for ensuring automation complies with all rules. | Restricted. Mubite’s marketing highlights Bybit API access, but its FAQ and Terms prohibit trading bots, high-frequency/latency strategies, and AI/algorithmic systems that create an “unfair advantage.” Manual API order entry is fine; automated bots are not permitted without approval. Confirm your setup with support first. |
| KYC & Restrictions | ||
| KYC Required | No | No |
| KYC Stage | KYC is required as part of the scholarship/withdrawal workflow. After a scholarship request is submitted in the dashboard, CFT states the trader receives a contract to sign and a KYC to complete before funds are sent. (Bybit evaluations may additionally be subject to Bybit’s own KYC rules, which are the trader’s responsibility.) | KYC is required before your first withdrawal. You can start trading on the connected Bybit/Cleo account without completing KYC, but identity verification (valid photo ID) must be passed before any payout is released. Verification typically takes ~48–72 hours. |
| Restricted Countries | N/A | Iran North Korea Myanmar Russia Belarus plus any jurisdiction under applicable international sanctions |
Crypto Fund Trader
Mubite
Build your own comparison
Select any 2-6 firms from this guide and open them in the full comparison table.
Tip: if you do not select any firms we will start with the top 2 from this guide.