Prop Firms Offering Crypto Leverage of 1:5 or Higher
This guide features prop firms that support crypto leverage starting from 1:5. Higher leverage availability can impact position sizing and capital efficiency in crypto trading. Filtering firms by leverage thresholds helps narrow suitable programs. All firms listed meet or exceed the selected crypto leverage level.
Switzerland
MT5
Match-Trader
Bybit
United Kingdom
MT5
Malta
Match-Trader
Singapore
cTrader
United States
MT5
cTrader
Match-Trader What a 1:5 crypto leverage floor actually means in a prop firm
The firms in the comparison above all offer at least 1:5 leverage on crypto positions inside their evaluation and funded accounts. In a prop-firm context, leverage is the buying power the firm extends on the simulated balance you are trading: at 1:5, a $100,000 evaluation account lets you control up to roughly $500,000 of notional crypto exposure across your open positions in that asset class. It is worth being precise about what this is and is not. You are not borrowing real money from a broker against margin you have deposited; you are trading the firm’s simulated capital under a contract, and the leverage figure is simply the position-size ceiling the firm’s risk engine permits before it rejects or auto-closes an order.
Crypto leverage is almost always set lower than the leverage the same firm offers on forex or indices. Where a firm might quote 1:50 or 1:100 on major currency pairs, crypto is frequently capped in the 1:2 to 1:10 region precisely because digital assets are far more volatile and can gap hard over weekends. So a 1:5 floor sits at the modest, conservative end for crypto specifically. It is a meaningful filter: it screens out programmes that treat crypto as an afterthought with 1:1 or 1:2 buying power, while not demanding the aggressive double-digit multipliers that only a minority of firms publish.
Who a 1:5 crypto leverage floor suits
This threshold tends to fit traders who want genuine crypto exposure inside an evaluation without chasing the highest possible multiplier. It is a sensible level if you:
- Trade Bitcoin or Ethereum swing and intraday setups and want enough size to make a position meaningful against the profit target, without one candle wiping the account.
- Run a strategy where position sizing — not raw leverage — does the heavy lifting, so 1:5 is ample headroom.
- Want to avoid firms that quietly throttle crypto to 1:1 or 1:2, which can make hitting a target on crypto alone impractical.
It suits you less well if your edge depends on very tight, highly leveraged scalps on altcoins, where you may want a firm publishing 1:10 or higher. Conversely, if you mostly trade forex and only dabble in crypto, even the lower-leverage programmes outside this list may serve you fine.
How 1:5 compares with higher and lower crypto leverage
The practical difference between leverage tiers is mostly about how quickly a move works for or against you relative to the firm’s drawdown rules:
- Below 1:5 (1:1 to 1:2) — you need more of the account’s notional committed to express the same view, and large crypto targets become harder to reach with controlled risk. Some firms set crypto this low specifically to discourage it.
- At 1:5 — a balance between usable size and survivability. A 5% adverse move on a fully utilised position is a serious but recoverable hit rather than an instant breach, which matters under tight daily and overall drawdown limits.
- Above 1:5 (1:10 and up) — more capital efficiency, but the same volatility that makes crypto attractive now threatens your max drawdown far faster. Higher leverage rarely changes your profit target; it just shortens the distance between a good day and a blown evaluation.
Because crypto can move several percent in minutes, the leverage number matters less than how the firm measures drawdown against it. A 1:5 cap paired with a generous trailing drawdown can be safer than 1:10 with an unforgiving daily loss limit.
What to check beyond the headline leverage number
A published “1:5 crypto” figure is a starting filter, not a guarantee. Before committing a challenge fee, verify the surrounding rules, because they decide whether that leverage is genuinely usable:
- Per-symbol and weekend caps — many firms reduce crypto leverage further on smaller-cap coins, or cut it ahead of weekends and holidays when liquidity thins and gaps are common. The headline number may apply only to BTC and ETH.
- Drawdown interaction — confirm whether losses are measured on balance or equity, and whether the daily loss limit is calculated intraday. High-leverage crypto plus an equity-based daily limit is the fastest way to breach an account.
- Spreads, swaps and weekend financing — crypto carrying costs and weekend financing on a simulated feed can be material; they eat into the profit target you are leveraging toward.
- Which crypto symbols are tradable at all — a firm can advertise crypto leverage while offering only a handful of pairs.
Remember the regulatory reality of this space. The firms in the list above are, in most countries, selling an evaluation service rather than operating as licensed brokers, so there is typically no local financial-regulator authorisation, no investor-compensation scheme, and no client-money segregation behind the account you trade. The simulated flow may be routed through a regulated broker in the background, but your contract is with the prop firm under its own terms. That makes the firm’s rule transparency, its published payout track record, and how clearly it documents crypto leverage and drawdown your real safeguards — not a licence number.
Frequently asked questions
Does 1:5 crypto leverage mean I’m borrowing money from the firm?
No. On a prop-firm evaluation you are trading the firm’s simulated capital under a contract, and 1:5 is simply the maximum notional position size the firm’s risk engine allows on crypto relative to your account balance. You have not deposited margin in a brokerage sense, and you are not borrowing real funds; you have paid a fee for an evaluation service.
Is 1:5 enough leverage to pass a crypto-focused challenge?
For most Bitcoin and Ethereum strategies it is comfortably enough — a $100,000 account at 1:5 controls around $500,000 of notional exposure, which is plenty to reach a typical profit target with controlled position sizing. If your edge depends on heavily leveraged altcoin scalping, you may prefer a firm publishing 1:10 or higher, but for crypto specifically 1:5 is a reasonable, survivable level.
Why is crypto leverage lower than the forex leverage these firms offer?
Digital assets are far more volatile and can gap sharply over weekends and holidays when liquidity is thin. Prop firms cap crypto leverage to protect both the trader and their own simulated risk exposure, which is why a firm offering 1:50 or 1:100 on major currency pairs will commonly restrict crypto to single-digit multiples like 1:5.
Should I pick the firm with the highest crypto leverage on the list?
Not automatically. Higher leverage rarely lowers your profit target — it just shortens the distance between a winning day and a breached drawdown limit. Weigh the leverage figure against how the firm measures daily and overall drawdown, any weekend or per-symbol caps, and its payout track record. A well-structured 1:5 programme can be easier to pass than an aggressive higher-leverage one with tight loss rules.
Crypto Fund Trader vs Funded Firm - Comparison of Top Firms in This Guide
Crypto Fund Trader vs Funded Firm - Prop Firm Comparison (June 2026)
Head-to-head comparison of Crypto Fund Trader and Funded Firm. Check max funding, profit splits, daily and overall drawdown rules, leverage, tradable assets, payout frequency, payment and payout methods, trading permissions and KYC restrictions before you buy a challenge. Data refreshed June 2026.
Bottom Line: Crypto Fund Trader vs Funded Firm
Funded Firm comes out ahead overall, leading in 6 of 9 compared categories.
Where Crypto Fund Trader leads
- Max Funding ($300,000 vs $100,000)
- Max Daily Loss (12% vs 3%)
- Platforms (3 vs 1)
Where Funded Firm leads
- Profit Split Max (100% vs 90%)
- Days to First Payout (7 vs 15)
- Profit Split Start (90% vs 80%)
- Max Total Loss (6% vs 2%)
- Payout Processing Time (1 vs 48)
- Payment Methods (5 vs 3)
Choose Crypto Fund Trader for Max Funding. Choose Funded Firm for Profit Split Max.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Crypto Fund Trader or Funded Firm better?
Which has a better Max Funding, Crypto Fund Trader or Funded Firm?
Which has a better Profit Split Max, Crypto Fund Trader or Funded Firm?
|
Crypto Fund Trader
Crypto Fund Trader (CFT) is a Switzerland-based crypto-first evaluation firm operated via SWISS RLCRATES AG that offers 1-phase, 2-phase, Instant and Ascend models with no time limits on standard challenges, trading via MT5, Match Trader and Bybit, simulated allocations up...
|
Funded Firm
FundedFirm is a UK-based proprietary trading firm launched in 2024. It offers 1‑Step and 2‑Step evaluation programs with unlimited time, allowing traders to trade forex, metals, indices, energies and cryptocurrencies on MT5. With leverage up to 1:100 (1:50 for crypto),...
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Trustpilot Rating | 0 | 0 |
| Trustpilot Reviews | 0 | 0 |
| Headquarters | Switzerland | United Kingdom |
| Age (Years) | 5 | 2 |
| Max Funding | $300,000 | $100,000 |
| Profit Split Start | 80% | 90% |
| Profit Split Max | 90% | 100% |
| Platforms | MT5 Match-Trader Bybit | mt5 |
| Assets | Crypto Forex Indices Commodities Stocks | Forex Precious Metals Indices Energies Cryptocurrencies |
| Leverage | ||
| FX Leverage | 100 | 100 |
| Metals Leverage | 100 | 100 |
| Crypto Leverage | 100 | 50 |
| Risk & Drawdown Rules | ||
| Max Daily Loss | Maximum Daily LossCrypto Fund Trader calculates daily drawdown based on equity. For standard evaluations, the daily maximum loss is measured from the starting balance at 12:05 AM UTC. CFT lists the default daily limits as 5% on 2-phase evaluations and 4% on 1-phase evaluations.Add-ons may modify certain limits (for example, a 2-phase add-on that increases daily drawdown to 6%). Ascend also adds a specific news window risk constraint (see “News Trading”). | 3–5 |
| Max Total Loss | Maximum Overall LossCFT’s standard evaluation structures use different overall loss models:2-Phase: maximum loss is typically fixed at 10% of initial balance.1-Phase: a 6% trailing drawdown applies (equity-based), and once the account exceeds +6% profit, the trailing line locks at the initial balance instead of continuing to trail upward.3-Phase (if selected): CFT states a 5% fixed maximum loss with a 5% daily max loss.Add-ons may increase max loss limits (e.g., a 2-phase add-on raising max loss to 12%). | 6–10 |
| Drawdown Type | Drawdown ModelCrypto Fund Trader’s drawdown enforcement is primarily equity-based. The daily loss limit resets using the account’s starting balance at 12:05 AM UTC. For overall drawdown, CFT uses static/fixed overall loss on 2-phase challenges (e.g., 10% of initial) and a trailing model on 1-phase challenges (6% trailing that later locks at the initial balance after +6% gain).Accounts that breach max daily, max overall, or trailing drawdown are deactivated and the trader is notified by email. | Fixed (daily 3–5% of starting equity; overall 6–10% of initial balance) |
| Payouts | ||
| Payout Frequency | Payout FrequencyIn the final-stage simulation, scholarship requests can be made after at least 15 trading days, or alternatively every 30 calendar days (if rules were not violated). Certain program variants (e.g., 3-phase rules) note a first request possible after 5 trading days, and an add-on may allow eligibility after 7 active trading days.For Instant accounts, CFT also supports a scale milestone: once the account reaches +10% profit, traders can request a “Withdrawal & Update” to both withdraw and double the account size. | Payouts can be requested weekly, bi‑weekly or monthly. Weekly cycles provide a 60% profit split, bi‑weekly cycles 80%, and monthly cycles up to 100%. Payouts for weekly and bi‑weekly plans are released every Wednesday starting from the second week after the account is opened. |
| Days to First Payout | 15 | 7 |
| Payout Processing Time | Payout ProcessingCFT states that once a scholarship is requested, its team verifies the information and sends payment within 48 business hours. After the payment is sent, CFT states the user receives the scholarship in no more than 24 hours (timing depends on the payment rail). | 1 |
| Payout Methods | Bank Transfer (EUR USD) Crypto (USDT ERC20 USDT TRC20 BTC ETH) | Bank transfer UPI BTC USDT TRC20 USDT BEP20 USDT ERC20 |
| Payments | ||
| Payment Methods | Credit/Debit Card Crypto (11 supported currencies) | UPI Bitcoin USDT TRC20 USDT BEP20 USDT ERC20 |
| Trading Permissions | ||
| News Trading | News trading is allowed on CFT evaluations according to its FAQ. For Ascend evaluations, CFT adds a news-window constraint: within 2 minutes before and after high-impact news or market opening, accounts must not open/add positions or raise maximum theoretical loss above 2% of initial balance. | News trading is allowed on all account types. Traders may open and close positions during high‑impact news releases. |
| Weekend Trades | Weekend/overnight holding is generally allowed (CFT states it accepts swing trading strategies and keeping trades open over the weekend). Market availability still follows instrument schedules: crypto trades 24/7 while forex is typically Monday–Friday and other CFDs follow their own market hours. | Overnight and weekend holding is allowed without restrictions. |
| Copy Trading | CFT does not present a simple “copy trading allowed” rule in its public FAQ. However, it explicitly restricts multi-account coordination through rules such as the reverse trading/hedging constraints, and it states that copy trading between Ascend accounts is prohibited (including coordinated or mirrored behaviour that cannot be attributed to chance). | Copy trading and mirroring strategies across accounts are prohibited. |
| EA Allowed | Automation is partially supported: CFT lists categories of prohibited EA types (notably HFT, tick scalping, arbitrage and demo-environment exploitation). EAs that do not fall into these categories are not explicitly banned in the FAQ, but traders remain responsible for ensuring automation complies with all rules. | Expert Advisors (EAs) and automated trading tools are not allowed. |
| KYC & Restrictions | ||
| KYC Required | No | No |
| KYC Stage | KYC is required as part of the scholarship/withdrawal workflow. After a scholarship request is submitted in the dashboard, CFT states the trader receives a contract to sign and a KYC to complete before funds are sent. (Bybit evaluations may additionally be subject to Bybit’s own KYC rules, which are the trader’s responsibility.) | KYC/AML verification is required before the first payout. Traders may need to provide government‑issued ID and proof of address to satisfy compliance checks. |
| Restricted Countries | N/A | No specific list of restricted countries is published but services may not be available in sanctioned jurisdictions such as North Korea Iran Syria and other high‑risk regions. |
Crypto Fund Trader
Funded Firm
Build your own comparison
Select any 2-6 firms from this guide and open them in the full comparison table.
Tip: if you do not select any firms we will start with the top 2 from this guide.